Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care

Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care

Authors

Keywords:

Thoracic imaging, Respiratory medicine , Medical education, Radiomics, Artificial intelligence, Robotics

Abstract

The Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology, held in Milan on November 21st, provided a unique educational platform exploring the evolving role of thoracic imaging in respiratory medicine. Organized by the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) Imaging Study Group, the congress brought together over 160 participants, including pulmonologists, radiologists, interventional specialists, and early-career professionals, reflecting the essential role of multidisciplinary collaboration in modern respiratory care. Topics included functional imaging approaches to small airway disease in COPD and asthma, multimodal imaging in lung transplantation, the role of CT angiography for haemoptysis management, and radiomics applications for quantifying emphysema patterns and fibrotic changes. The role of imaging in guiding inhaled and biological therapies was explored, alongside a lively debate on thoracic ultrasound for interstitial lung disease screening. Advanced sessions covered medical thoracoscopy techniques, quantitative ultrasound and artificial intelligence in pleural diseases, shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for peripheral nodules, expanding cryobiopsy applications, and imaging’s role in monitoring progressive pulmonary fibrosis therapeutics. A distinctive feature was the first “Images in Pulmonology” contest, won by a remarkable case simultaneously depicting lung cancer and new life. This meeting report summarizes key congress highlights and underscores the importance of fostering multidisciplinary collaboration and structured imaging education to bridge the gap between technological capabilities and clinical expertise in respiratory medicine.

References

1. Nishino M, Schiebler ML. Advances in Thoracic Imaging: Key Developments in the Past Decade and Future Directions. Radiology 2023;306(2):e222536.

2. De Boer WS, Veldman C, Parlevliet KL, Van Geffen WH, Edens MA, Stigt JA, et al. The current state of ultrasound training in pulmonary residency programmes in the Netherlands: an educational review. Breathe 2025;21(3):250099.

3. Makimoto K, Singh GV, Kirby M. Advances in detecting small airway disease with medical imaging. Eur Respir J 2025;65(4):2500212.

4. Lazarinis N, Fouka E, Linden A, Bossios A. Small airways disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 2024;18(7):539–52.

5. Kim T, Kim Y, Bak SH, Shin SH, Lee HY, Im Y, et al. Longitudinal parametric response mapping on CT in assessing functional small airway disease and emphysema in COPD. Sci Rep 2025;15(1):37221.

6. Vasilescu DM, Martinez FJ, Marchetti N, Galbán CJ, Hatt C, Meldrum CA, et al. Noninvasive Imaging Biomarker Identifies Small Airway Damage in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200(5):575–81.

7. Mohamady YK, Geudens V, De Fays C, Zapata M, Hagrass O, Aversa L, et al. Computational fluid dynamics of small airway disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. EBioMedicine 2025;114:105670.

8. Galbán CJ, Han MK, Boes JL, Chughtai KA, Meyer CR, Johnson TD, et al. Computed tomography–based biomarker provides unique signature for diagnosis of COPD phenotypes and disease progression. Nat Med 2012;18(11):1711–5.

9. Pompe E, Galbán CJ, Ross BD, Koenderman L, Ten Hacken NH, Postma DS, et al. Parametric response mapping on chest computed tomography associates with clinical and functional parameters in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2017;123:48–55.

10. Chukowry PS, Spittle DA, Turner AM. Small Airways Disease, Biomarkers and COPD: Where are We? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021;16:351–65.

11. Calvert AD, Hazelton TR. Role of imaging in lung transplantation evaluation. J Thorac Dis 2020;12(9):5147–58.

12. Kim SJ, Azour L, Hutchinson BD, Shirsat H, Zhou F, Narula N, et al. Imaging Course of Lung Transplantation: From Patient Selection to Postoperative Complications. RadioGraphics 2021;41(4):1043–63.

13. Li Ng Y, Paul N, Patsios D, Walsham A, Chung TB, Keshavjee S, et al. Imaging of Lung Transplantation: Review. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009;192(3_supplement):S1–13.

14. Thomas C, Williams M, Shlobin OA. Lung Transplantation: Selection of Candidates. OBM Transplant 2023;07(04):1–33.

15. Sun H, Deng M, Chen W, Liu M, Dai H, Wang C. Graft dysfunction and rejection of lung transplant, a review on diagnosis and management. Clin Respir J 2022;16(1):5–12.

16. Madan R, Chansakul T, Goldberg HJ. Imaging in lung transplants: Checklist for the radiologist. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014;24(4):318–26.

17. Mondoni M, Rinaldo RF, Solidoro P, Di Marco F, Patrucco F, Pavesi S, et al. Interventional pulmonology techniques in lung transplantation. Respiratory Medicine 2023;211:107212.

18. Mondoni M, Sferrazza Papa GF, Sotgiu G, Carlucci P, Pellegrino GM, Centanni S. Haemoptysis: a frequent diagnostic challenge. Eur Respir J 2016;47(1):348–50.

19. Larici AR, Franchi P, Occhipinti M, Contegiacomo A, del Ciello A, Calandriello L, et al. Diagnosis and management of hemoptysis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20(4):299–309.

20. Shao H, Wu J, Wu Q, Sun X, Li L, Xing Z, et al. Bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis: a retrospective observational study of 344 patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128(1):58–62.

21. Sadidi S, Roozafzai F, Nekooei S, Jarahi L, Khoroushi F. Predictors of 12-Month Recurrence of Hemoptysis after Bronchial Artery Embolization. Arch Iran Med 2025;28(2):100–6.

22. Xu S, Guan LJ, Shi BQ, Tan YS, Zhang XJ. Recurrent Hemoptysis After Bronchial Artery Embolization: Prediction Using a Nomogram and Artificial Neural Network Model. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020;215(6):1490–8.

23. Occhipinti M, Filippi AR, Walsh S, van Meerbeeck JP. Editorial: Imaging assessment of response to immunotherapy. Front Oncol 2022;12:1116315.

24. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, Van Stiphout RGPM, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European Journal of Cancer 2012;48(4):441–6.

25. Lee G, Park H, Bak SH, Lee HY. Radiomics in Lung Cancer from Basic to Advanced: Current Status and Future Directions. Korean J Radiol 2020;21(2):159.

26. Zhao X, Qiu X. Computed tomography radiomics-based prognosis prediction of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 2024;17(4):101168.

27. Depeursinge A, Chin AS, Leung AN, Terrone D, Bristow M, Rosen G, et al. Automated classification of usual interstitial pneumonia using regional volumetric texture analysis in high-resolution computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2015;50(4):261–7.

28. Marchi G. Artificial intelligence for pleural effusion and pneumothorax detection on thoracic ultrasound: an educational viewpoint on promise, pitfalls, and path forward. Breathe 2026 [In Press].

29. Cousin F, Louis T, Frères P, Guiot J, Occhipinti M, Bottari F, et al. Machine Learning Model Integrating CT Radiomics of the Lung to Predict Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2025;24:15330338251344004.

30. Marchi G, Fanni SC, Mercier M, Cefalo J, Salerni C, Ferioli M, et al. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in drug-induced interstitial lung disease. ERJ Open Res 2025;01150–2025.

31. https://ginasthma.org/reports/

32. https://goldcopd.org/2026-gold-report/

33. Kim WD. Phenotype of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Based on Computed Tomography-Defined Underlying Pathology. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2022;85(4):302–12.

34. Varricchi G, Poto R, Lommatzsch M, Brusselle G, Braido F, Virchow JC, et al. Biologics and airway remodeling in asthma: early, late, and potential preventive effects. Allergy 2025;80(2):408–22.

35. Götschke J, Walter J, Leuschner G, Gerckens M, Götschke M, Mertsch P, et al. Mucus Plug Score Predicts Clinical and Pulmonary Function Response to Biologic Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2025;13(5):1110-1122.e1.

36. Benlala I, Dournes G, Girodet PO, Laurent F, Ben Hassen W, Baldacci F, et al. Bronchial wall T2w MRI signal as a new imaging biomarker of severe asthma. Insights Imaging 2025;16(1):71.

37. Shah DJ, Esposito A, Pitaktong A, Sauthoff H. Thoracic ultrasound in interstitial lung disease. Breathe (Sheff) 2025;21(2):240170.

38. Zheng S, Zhou Z, Du G, Chen Q, Chen S, Lin J, et al. The diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in the assessment of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2025;27(1):159.

39. Otaola M, Vasarmidi E, Ottaviani S, Gutierrez M, Dalpiaz MS, Gaser A, et al. Performance of Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Subclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. CHEST 2025;167(6):1687–95.

40. Laursen CB, Clive A, Hallifax R, Pietersen PI, Asciak R, Davidsen JR, et al. European Respiratory Society statement on thoracic ultrasound. Eur Respir J 2021;57(3):2001519.

41. Mondoni M, Saderi L, Trogu F, Terraneo S, Carlucci P, Ghelma F, et al. Medical thoracoscopy treatment for pleural infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med 2021;21(1):127.

42. Lovato JB, Aujayeb A, Duysinx B, Astoul P. The Evolving Role of Medical Thoracoscopy for the Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion. Curr Oncol 2025;32(12):670.

43. Lee HJ, Akulian JA, Argento AC, Batra H, Lamb C, Mullon J, et al. Interventional Pulmonary Fellowship Training: End of the Beginning. ATS Scholar 2023;4(4):405–12.

44. Marchi G, Mercier M, Cefalo J, Salerni C, Ferioli M, Candoli P, et al. Advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence in pleural diseases: a narrative review. Eur Respir Rev 2025;34(176):240263.

45. Marchi G. The road less travelled: thoracic ultrasound, advanced imaging and artificial intelligence for early diagnosis of non-expandable lung in malignant pleural effusion. Breathe 2025;21(3):250179.

46. Marchi G. Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology: Promise versus Proof. Respiration 2025;1–2.

47. Marchi G, Gabbrielli L, Gherardi M, Serradori M, Baglivo F, Fanni SC, et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Analysis for Pleural Effusion Detection on Thoracic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2026;16(1):147.

48. Marchi G, Cucchiara F, Gregori A, Biondi G, Guglielmi G, Serradori M, et al. Thoracic Ultrasound for Pre-Procedural Dynamic Assessment of Non-Expandable Lung: A Non-Invasive, Real-Time and Multifaceted Diagnostic Tool. JCM 2025;14(6):2062.

49. Marchi G. Exploring pleural effusion characterisation with quantitative thoracic ultrasound imaging: a viewpoint on the investigational role of pixel-based echogenicity analysis in transudate and exudate differentiation. Breathe 2025;21(4):250282.

50. Marchi G, Chaabouni M, Bakiri K, et al. ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Clinical Techniques, Imaging and Endoscopy Assembly. ERJ Open Res 2026;12:01564-2025.

51. Bedawi EO, Talwar A, Hassan M, McCracken DJ, Asciak R, Mercer RM, et al. Intercostal vessel screening prior to pleural interventions by the respiratory physician: a prospective study of real world practice. Eur Respir J 2020;55(4):1902245.

52. Marchi G, Cinquini S, Tannura F, Guglielmi G, Gelli R, Pantano L, et al. Intercostal Artery Screening with Color Doppler Thoracic Ultrasound in Pleural Procedures: A Potential Yet Underexplored Imaging Modality for Minimizing Iatrogenic Bleeding Risk in Interventional Pulmonology. JCM 2025;14(17):6326.

53. Deng M, Xia Y, Ye X, Ma J, Zhao S, Zhang Q, et al. Ultrasonic elastography-guided pleural biopsy versus traditional thoracic ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy for the diagnosis of pleural effusion: a multicentre, randomised trial. Eur Respir J 2025;66(6):2501062.

54. Safai Zadeh E, Weide J, Dietrich CF, Trenker C, Koczulla AR, Görg C. Diagnostic Accuracy of B-Mode- and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Pleural Effusions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(7):1293.

55. Baribeau Y, Sharkey A, Chaudhary O, Krumm S, Fatima H, Mahmood F, et al. Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound Probes: The New Generation of POCUS. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020;34(11):3139–45.

56. Causio FA, DE Angelis L, Diedenhofen G, Talio A, Baglivo F, Workshop Participants. Perspectives on AI use in medicine: views of the Italian Society of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. J Prev Med Hyg 2024;65(2):E285–9.

57. Ahmed MI, Spooner B, Isherwood J, Lane M, Orrock E, Dennison A. A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Cureus 2023;15(10):e46454.

58. Baloescu C, Bailitz J, Cheema B, Agarwala R, Jankowski M, Eke O, et al. Artificial Intelligence–Guided Lung Ultrasound by Nonexperts. JAMA Cardiol 2025;10(3):245.

59. Howell L, Ingram N, Lapham RC, Morrell A, McLaughlan JR. Deep learning for real-time multi-class segmentation of artefacts in lung ultrasound. Vol. 140, Ultrasonics. Elsevier B.V.; 2024.

60. Ibrahim M, Khalil YA, Amirrajab S, Sun C, Breeuwer M, Pluim J, et al. Generative AI for synthetic data across multiple medical modalities: A systematic review of recent developments and challenges. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2025;189:109834.

61. Abgrall G, Holder AL, Chelly Dagdia Z, Zeitouni K, Monnet X. Should AI models be explainable to clinicians? Crit Care 2024;28(1):301.

62. Marchi, G.; Gambini, G.; Guglielmi, G.; Pistelli, F.; Carrozzi, L. Valutazione comparativa di modelli linguistici di grandi dimensioni per il supporto all’educazione sanitaria del paziente con BPCO: Uno studio pneumologico internazionale delle risposte generate da ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet e Gemini 1.5 Advanced. Recent. Progress. Med. 2025, 116, 571–572.

63. Marchi G. Decoding the “black-box”: explainable artificial intelligence towards trustworthy advancement in respiratory medicine. Breathe 2026 [In Press].

64. Ferioli M, Romagnoli M, Candoli P. Editorial: Advances in bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Front Oncol 2024;14:1428006.

65. Carvalho C, Van Heumen S, Funke F, Heuvelmans MA, Serino M, Frille A, et al. The role of interventional pulmonology in management of pulmonary nodules during lung cancer screening. Breathe 2025;21(4):240256.

66. Gorini, G.; Puliti, D.; Picozzi, G.; Giovannoli, J.; Veronesi, G.; Pistelli, F.; Senore, C.; Tessa, C.; Cavigli, E.; Bisanzi, S.; et al. CCM-ITALUNG2 pilot on lung cancer screening in Italy: Recruitment, integration with smoking cessation and baseline results. Radiol. Medica 2025.

67. Brock JM, Dittrich AS, Kontogianni K, Heussel CP, Klotz LV, Winter H, et al. First European Experience of Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy: Learning Curve Analysis. Respiration 2025;104(10):736–49.

68. Chang ATC, Chan JWY, Siu ICH, Liu W, Lau RWH, Ng CSH. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy-advancing lung cancer management. Front Surg 2025;12:1566902.

69. Corbetta L, Arru LB, Mereu C, Pasini V, Patelli M. Competence and training in interventional pulmonology. Panminerva Med 2019;61(3).

70. Mondoni M, Wahidi MM, Sotgiu G. Combination of cryobiopsy with EBUS-TBNA–Might rapid on-site evaluation successfully drive patient selection? Pulmonology 2024;30(5):416–8.

71. Mondoni M, Sotgiu G. Optimizing the endoscopic diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a glimpse on cryobiopsy. BMC Pulm Med 2022;22(1):355.

72. Poletti V, Tomassetti S, Ravaglia C. Time to Trust Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in Identification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Pattern? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;203(10):1218–20.

73. Roselló SP, Alonso-Fernández A, Anieto MB, Valades AF, Bellvert CG, Cosío BG, et al. Diagnostic performance and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsies in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. Respiratory Medicine 2025;247:108294.

74. Misra S, Bandyopadhyay A, Patra A, Mitra R, Sengupta A, Kundu S. A single-centre, randomised trial to compare diagnostic yield and safety between endobronchial cryobiopsy and endobronchial forceps biopsy procedure in patients with endobronchial lesions. Lung India 2025;42(3):204–10.

75. Luppi F, Manfredi A, Faverio P, Franco G, Salvarani C, Bendstrup E, et al. Treatment of acute exacerbation in interstitial lung disease secondary to autoimmune rheumatic diseases: More questions than answers. Autoimmunity Reviews 2024;23(12):103668.

76. Luppi F, Kalluri M, Faverio P, Kreuter M, Ferrara G. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis beyond the lung: understanding disease mechanisms to improve diagnosis and management. Respir Res 2021;22(1):109.

77. Fahim A. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis–A challenging disease with new horizons and changing therapeutic landscape. Clinical Respiratory J 2021;15(4):369–73.

78. Qiu Y, Ye W. Therapeutic efficacy of pirfenidone and nintedanib in pulmonary fibrosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Med 2025;20(3):145–52.

79. Maher TM, Assassi S, Azuma A, Cottin V, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Kreuter M, et al. Nerandomilast in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2025;392(22):2203–14.

Downloads

Published

05-03-2026

Issue

Section

Short Reports

How to Cite

1.
Marchi G, Mondoni M. Highlights from the Italian National Congress of Imaging in Pulmonology 2025: fostering implementation of advanced technologies for precision patient-centered care. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2026;21:1086. doi:10.5826/mrm.2026.1086