Unmasking hypoxemia: the role of standard PaO₂ in interpreting Arterial blood gas analysis
Keywords:
ARF, Acute respiratory failure, P-SILI, ABGAbstract
Background: In the assessment of acute respiratory failure (ARF), PaO2/FIO2 ratio is widely used, but may be misleading in the presence of hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia. The standard PaO2 (stPaO2), a theoretical value corrected for PaCO2, may improve clinical interpretation of gas exchange severity.
Methods: We conducted an online survey among Italian physicians using a case vignette of three hypothetical patients with identical PaO2 values but differing PaCO2 levels. Participants were asked to rank the severity of the cases based solely on arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). A second round was offered after introducing the concept of stPaO2 and providing corresponding values.
Results: A total of 2,241 (8.9%) physicians (median age 53 years, 54.1% male) completed the first round and 1,324 (59%) completed the second one of the survey. Initially, only 9.2% correctly identified the clinical severity
pattern–this increased significantly to 16.1% after introducing stPaO2 (p < 0.01). The improvement rate was higher among physicians with less than 10 years of clinical experience. Performance improved across all specialties, particularly in emergency and intensive care medicine.
Conclusions: The introduction of stPaO2 significantly enhanced physicians’ ability to interpret ABG results in ARF. Although its calculation assumes ideal physiological conditions, stPaO2 remains a useful tool for unmasking hypoxemia in hyperventilating patients. Including stPaO2 in ABG reports may support more accurate clinical decision-making, particularly in emergency and critical care settings.
References
1. Kufel TJ, Grant BJB. Arterial blood-gas monitoring: respiratory assessment. In: Tobin MJ, ed. Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p.197–215.
2. West JB, Luks A. West’s respiratory physiology: the essentials. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
3. Aboab J, Louis B, Jonson B, Brochard L. Relation between PaO2/FIO2 ratio and FIO2: a mathematical description. Intensive Care Med 2006;32(10):1494–7. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0337-9.
4. Raimondi F, Novelli L, Marchesi G, Fabretti F, Grazioli L, Riva I, et al. Worsening of gas exchange parameters at high FIO2 in COVID-19: misleading or informative? Multidiscip Respir Med 2021;16(1):759. doi:10.4081/mrm.2021.759.
5. Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F. PaO2/FIO2 ratio: the mismeasure of oxygenation in COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2021;57(3):2100274. doi:10.1183/13993003.00274-2021.
6. Riley RL, Lilienthal JL Jr. On the determination of the physiologically effective pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide in alveolar air. Am J Physiol 1946;147:191–8. doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1946.147.1.191.
7. Mays EE. An arterial blood gas diagram for clinical use. Chest 1973;63(5):793–800. doi:10.1378/chest.63.5.793.
8. Prediletto I, D’Antoni L, Carbonara P, Daniele F, Dongilli R, Flore R, et al. Standardizing PaO2 for PaCO2 in P/F ratio predicts in-hospital mortality in acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19: a pilot prospective study. Eur J Intern Med 2021;92:48–54. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.002.
9. Gattinoni L, Busana M, Camporota L. Standardised PaO2/FiO2 ratio in COVID-19: added value or risky assumptions? Eur J Intern Med 2021;92:31–3. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2021.09.004.
10. Brochard L, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A. Mechanical ventilation to minimize progression of lung injury in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195(4):438–42. doi:10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP.
11. Cho YI, Johnson TP, VanGeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof 2013;36(3):382–407. doi:10.1177/0163278713496425.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Mattioli 1885 has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
How to Cite
